Best practicesCreated on: 2 April 2026

Stockholm (Sweden): an identity forged in industrial and port history

Goal 8.2

Revising the status of port and City Port heritage to properly reflect the site’s historical significance.

Challenge(s)

How can the historical character be maintained in Port-City interface zone redevelopments?

Best Practice

Port cities have a shared identity that sets them apart from other cities. Yet each port city also draws on its history to forge its distinct identity. By including symbolic port installations (rails, cranes, containers, etc.) in urban planning and architectural projects and referencing port-related terminology in the choice of materials, colours, and elements, project stakeholders can preserve and capitalise on this dual territorial identity. A way of achieving this character is by implementing a masterplan for desired areas or incentivising new developments to design with this mindset. Stockholm took this approach, where a new housing development follows the port aesthetic.

Case Study

Cet article est réservé aux adhérents de l’AIVP

Intégrez le premier réseau mondial dédié aux relations ville-port et bénéficiez de services exclusifs comme notre Veille Stratégique.

Adhérer à l’AIVP

All the best practices

A valuable decision-making tool to help implement the AIVP 2030 Agenda in your territory. Join the network to access all best practices!

Contact us