The City-Port Interface: A Resource for Diverse Development Projects

The AIVP was originally created to facilitate the exchange of best practices regarding waterfront redevelopment, particularly when industrial areas have lost their original purpose and become new, dynamic urban spaces. Today, the city-port interface represents both an opportunity and a challenge; it serves as a filter and a meeting place, a physical space and an institutional, environmental, and social membrane where intense interactions take place among the various stakeholders. Of course, developing this interface is no simple task.

As we see in our port cities, some of the primary concerns remain: What should be done with neglected port areas? What programs should be implemented to foster healthier city-port relationships? What planning principles are best suited to the requirements of sustainable development? From reducing environmental impacts to preserving the port’s cultural heritage, Goal 8—which specifically targets the city-port interface—is interconnected with the other nine goals of the AIVP 2030 Agenda.

Link to the United Nations SDGs

04 - Éducation de qualité
11 - Villes et communautés durables

The goals of this commitment

To provide residents living near port activities with better living conditions and recreational and cultural opportunities at the city-port interfaces, the AIVP has identified four priorities for action:

The incorporation of measures to reduce port-related nuisances into the design of urban spaces and buildings.

Reducing port-related nuisances does not rely solely on technical measures involving equipment (quieter engines, dust control at terminals, noise barriers). It can also be incorporated from the very beginning of architectural and urban design projects at the city-port interface: building orientation, the creation of green buffer zones, the organization of land uses based on noise exposure levels, and the design of public spaces that offer views of the port while filtering out noise pollution. This is a holistic approach that views the city-port interface as a system to be optimized as a whole.

Example — Redevelopment of Javel Bas Port 🏅 Special Mention (Paris, France)
The large warehouse has been divided into six architecturally refined wooden buildings, whose layout ensures that no obstructive structures limit public access. Automatic gates secure the loading areas and open to pedestrians as soon as operations are complete—a coexistence made possible by the space’s intelligent design.

The redevelopment of port and urban-port heritage sites, and the preservation of the sites’ history.

The industrial and maritime heritage of port cities is a significant cultural and tourist resource, one that is all too often sacrificed to the tabula rasa approach of urban redevelopment. Grain silos, historic cranes, 19th-century warehouses, administrative buildings of the East India Company, docks, and dry docks: these structures tell the economic and social history of port cities and serve as strong symbols of identity for residents. Their rehabilitation—whether adaptive or for museum use—is essential to the cultural continuity of port areas undergoing transformation.

Example — Port-City Integration Projects in Dublin (Dublin, Ireland)
The former electrical substation, built in 1923, has been renovated into a multifunctional event space that combines heritage preservation with contemporary architecture. The Pumphouse Heritage Area transforms a former boat maintenance area into a vibrant cultural hub, featuring exhibitions, performances, and educational workshops on Dublin’s port history.

The development of public spaces and recreational or cultural facilities at the city-port interfaces, with the aim of turning them into new attractions.

City-port interfaces, now freed from the industrial activities that once occupied them, offer exceptional land-use opportunities to create high-quality public facilities in cities that are often short on available land. Parks, urban beaches, sports facilities, outdoor cultural venues, markets, and playgrounds: these developments enhance a city’s appeal, improve the quality of life for local residents, and create new reasons to visit the port.

Example — Bekkelagsbadet (Oslo, Norway)
The former container terminal has been transformed into a public park featuring a swimming area, a diving tower, and extensive green spaces with sports facilities. The project, designed in collaboration with residents—especially children—illustrates how an uninviting port area can become a beloved neighborhood facility embraced by the community.

The architectural and landscape integration of port facilities into their urban environment.

A port terminal, a grain silo, or a cold storage facility does not have to be nothing but glass and steel devoid of urban character. With architectural ambition and careful consideration of how they fit into the urban and natural landscape, port facilities can become aesthetic landmarks and contribute to a city’s visual identity. The architectural quality of port facilities sends a message to residents about the port’s regard for them.

Example — Saint Louis Nautical Pole (Sète, France)
The contemporary raw concrete building, clad in crushed oyster shells from local farms, has become a visual landmark of the Môle Saint-Louis. Its bold architecture creates a poetic dialogue between industrial materials and local natural resources, demonstrating that even a functional port facility can be a remarkable piece of architecture.

News related to the city-port interface

Do you share this same goal of improving the relationship between the city and the port?

Join AIVP and take part in a collaborative effort to promote more sustainable, responsible, and innovative urban, port, and economic development that puts citizens at the heart of its work.

Contact us